Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Opinions on the utility of monopods?

Subject: RE: [OM] Opinions on the utility of monopods?
From: Tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:13:11 -0500
> > Here's another question for the group - what is the utility of a
> > monopod?

Allows use of smaller apertures or lower speeds - about 2 stops worth.

Good for holding up heavy lenses & cameras for long periods - and leaning 
on.

Lighter to carry, especially the carbon fibre walking sticks.

Flexible for pointing instantly to different directions at sporting events.

No legs to get in the way when shifting directions 100 degrees or more.

Quicker to set up, move, and direct.

Less $$.

Looks professional. Cheap tripods look fussy. 

Can use more easily (and covertly) in tighter areas - concerts, events.

Good for museums and other "proper" places  - if you put a handle on it to 
look like a cane.

More easily used for self-defence.

In defence of tripods:
        - sharper pictures
        - unlimited use of smaller apertures, lower speeds
        - can more exactly position camera
        - self-timer & remote work
        - offers more exercise to lose weight (PBMs please note)


------------------- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ottawa-
photo-clubs
tOM A. Trottier,        ICQ:57647974    http://abacurial.com
        758 Albert St, Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8 
        +1 613 860-6633 fax:231-6115    N45.412 
W75.714
"The moment one gives close attention to anything, 
even a blade of grass, it becomes a mysterious, 
awesome, indescribably magnificent world in itself -- 
Henry Miller, 1891-1980


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz