To my understanding the one hour lab printing machine will do its auto
adjustment first and the operator may or may not add his/her own adjustment
during printing. So some color adjustment are probably made automatically.
The MC 50/1.4 is definitely cooler (color bal.) than the SC one. The lens
you tested is <1,000,000 I think you need to try the SN>1,100,000 one, it is
further sharper but color under fluorescence without correction is not a
fair test condition for the lenses.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "M. Royer"
> Don't think so. I was there when they printed the pics
> out and the pics looked greenish over the viewer and
> when printed. The only thing the processor ever had to
> do was lower or raise the density on a couple of shots
> to get a bit more detail or curtail some slight
> lightness. She said my pics were remarkably well
> exposed and most of them went through the machine
> uncorrected (to my knowledge)
>
> Mark Lloyd
>
> --- Allan Wafkowski <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm quite certain this is the result of film
> > processing, not a
> > manifestation of the lens.
> >
> > Allan
> >
> >
> > On Friday, December 14, 2001, at 02:16 AM, M. Royer
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The other lens I recently got, the 50/1.4, was a
> > > dissappointment to me. The images were very
> > noticealby
> > > cooler and had a nasty greenish tint to them from
> > the
> > > flouresence. The rest of the color transmission
> > seemed
> > > somewhat off as well, colors seemed to clash with
> > this
> > > 50, rather than blend like the 90 and delineate
> > with
> > > the 50/2.
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|