Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?

Subject: Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 15:16:59 -0800
At 03:05 PM 12/13/2001 -0800, you wrote:
I have owned both.  I'm on my second 200/4 now (first one got
broken elements).  The 200/4 is better to focus with.  The F5 is
just a hint too slow.

The 200/4 also makes (with extension tubes) a most wonderful
macro lens.  The bokeh is dreamy.  However, stopped WAY down, it
gives awesome DOF and sharpness.  Size/Weight of the 200/4 is
nearly perfect.
...

Hmm.. can you give me a hint of which extension tubes work with the 200/4?


// richard http://www.imagecraft.com
[ For technical support, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz