Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?

Subject: Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?
From: "Bachofen" <mbachofen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:40:40 -0600
Yeah, I have the Viv S1 200 f3.  It is a BEAST.  Someone on the list used to 
call his 135, I think, Fat Viv.
I started calling my 200 that. It's like carrying around a fireplug.  It'll be 
cool when I get my OM/pen adapter. :^)
M.E.Bachofen


*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 12/13/01 at 6:28 PM Pandionhalietius@xxxxxxx wrote:

><<
> Get the Vivitar 200/3. Nice & hefty.
>
> Tom >>
>
>I've shot with a  Zuiko MC 200/4 since 1978 and love it.  Size, balance,
>quality.
>I have to slip in a vote for the Tamron SP 180/2.5 again.  It has internal
>focus down to under 4 feet, and just amazing sharpness.
>The Ser 1 200/3 Vivitar is also a fantastic lens "option" and also focuses
>very close. Buy one or have them all and decide later...
>
>John
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz