Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?

Subject: Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?
From: Tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:47:30 -0500
Get the Vivitar 200/3. Nice & hefty.

Tom

On Thursday, December 13, 2001 at 12:39, Daniel J. Mitchell 
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote re "[OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?" saying:

>  Both of these are available locally. (for a bit more than skipwilliams's
> averages say they should be costing, but once I add in shipping + duty it
> seems more reasonable) and I'm tempted by a decent prime at that length.
> 
>  Do people have preferences for one over the other? Checking on e-sif,
> unsurprisingly the tradeoff is between weight/size and rather less than a
> stop (I think) of speed -- if anyone has both, which do you find you use
> more? Gary Reese's tests suggest that the f4 performs noticeably better than
> the f5, interestingly.


------- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur -----------------
   ,__@ Tom A. Trottier +1 613 860-6633 
fax:231-6115
 _-\_<, 758 Albert St.,Ottawa Ont. Canada K1R 
7V8     
(*)/'(*)        ICQ:57647974    Tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx N45.412 
W75.714
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Laws are the spider's webs which, if anything small falls 
into them 
they ensnare it, but large things break through and 
escape.
        --Solon, statesman (c.638-c558 BCE)
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little 
temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- 
Benjamin Franklin


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz