ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!

Subject:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!
From:	DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx
Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2001 02:29:01 EDT

In a message dated 9/14/01 2:09:13 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

<< Quickflash QF310. >>
that's the one...thank you for NOT making me go drag it out and look...:+)

Susan Steele
Virginia USA 
The best way to forget all your troubles is to wear tight shoes. 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, (continued) Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Jim Couch Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Henrik Dahl Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, c.e.packard Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, andrew fildes Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Jim Couch Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, John Hermanson Re: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Bill Stanke Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy <= [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Larry Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Garth Wood Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Charles Loeven [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, andrew fildes Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account RE: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Wayne Harridge

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] [OT] Shoes - was: America: The good Neighbor, DaEyeGuy
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Re: America: The good Neighbor, Tris Schuler
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Bill Stanke
Next by Thread:	[OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]