| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM2000 in Retrospect vs. OM-2S, etc? |
|---|---|
| From: | The Butler Family <butlerfamly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 12 Aug 2001 21:36:00 -0700 |
Bill Barber wrote: Amen to brother Ken N's assessment on the OM 2S.
Here Here!
I remember Ken's posts of a few years ago. It was due to his and
Gary's Reese and Schloss' recommendations that I finally bought a 2s
about two years ago. Since then it has had better than 100 rolls
through it with a fair amount of flash use and it is only on its third
set of batteries. This means of course I will now have to replace them
the next time I try to use it, but so be it. The batteries it uses are
very cheap compared to the CR123's my wife's P&S uses about five time as
fast.
My only fear is that, by the time it does die their true value will
be realized and I will need to take out a second on my house to replace
it.
Mike Butler
Dublin, California
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Baby Pictures, Doggre |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] OM2S with T32 Flash #3, DBellamy2k |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM2000 in Retrospect vs. OM-2S, etc?, DBellamy2k |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] OM2000 in Retrospect vs. OM-2S, etc?, Daniel J. Mitchell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |