ML Archiv: Re: [OM] slide copier

Subject:	Re: [OM] slide copier
From:	"Hans van Veluwen" <hcvanveluwen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 5 May 2001 20:30:45 +0200

: Good to know. But I was hoping to copy the entire image without
: buying an expensive machine. My local lab can do it but the bill adds
: up in a hurry. I suspect I'm SOL.

For that I would put the framed slide onto a neutral colored light panel for
slide viewing and use the 135mm/F4.5 macro.


hnz


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2, (continued) RE: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2, Scott Gomez [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, Clemente Colayco Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, frieder . faig Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, Chris Barker Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, T . Clausen Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2 --- Macro calculations for 85/2, frieder . faig Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, John A. Lind [OM] slide copier, Clyde Soles Re: [OM] slide copier, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] slide copier, Clyde Soles Re: [OM] slide copier, Hans van Veluwen <= Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, Barry B. Bean Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2, andrew fildes Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2, Alan Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2, C.H.Ling

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] [OT] Flash vs. Auto light meters, Clyde Soles
Next by Date:	[OM] Too late for TOPE 5, John Hudson
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] slide copier, Clyde Soles
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, Barry B. Bean
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]