Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2

Subject: Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2
From: "Alan" <atk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 5 May 2001 15:24:34 -0000
I'm a little (very?) surprise that a full frame 8x10 with the 90f2 would be
"soft".

I've taken quite a few pictures with the viv series 1 90 as full/half frame
ports of people/animal and at 8x10 they are quite crisp (I'll try to scan one
next week that I took last year). Often softness occurs with this lens due to 
my own poor technique the particular picture I'm thinking of I was lying down
and well braced (didn't hurt that it was sunny and I was able to use a high
shutter speed). I would think the olympus 90f2 is as good or better lens.

I think I'm pretty picky - after all I still consider the 24 to be a bit
soft at infinity.... and I consider the picture I took with the 21 (in the 
last tope) to also be a little soft though part of it is a scanning problem.

Alan

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz