I have to agree. Although I sold mine recently, as I have too many Zuikooms,
it is a great lens. Small, light, one-touch. I liked it a lot.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Reese" <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:05 AM
Subject: [OM] wide angle and zoom lens
> Hi Pablo:
>
> << I would like to ask for advice for a telephoto zoom lens. is the
> 100-200 OK? >>
>
> As you can see at:
> http://members.aol.com/olympusom/lenstests/default.htm
> the 100-200mm S Zuiko is capable of some remarkable performance for the
> cost and especially weight. If you can find one without zoom creep and
> you show care in reducing vibrations when photographing, it is capable
> of quite fine results, with remarkably contrasty images for a zoom lens.
> If I didn't already have two zoom lenses that better it (the Tamron SP
> 80-200mm f/2.8 ED IF and the 65-200mm f/4 Zuiko), I'd keep one around.
>
> Gary Reese
> Las Vegas, NV
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|