If your picture is only for web use, then digital camera may be good
enough. But if you want quality prints you need a good quality
scanner. I can't sit there waiting for a digital camera with at least
3000x2000 pixels (3CCDs equivalent not single CCD with small among of
color elements to "estimate the color") low noise CCD, 12 bit AD
convertor, interchangeable lens or a zoom from 21-200mm come up. Also,
very important, I need a short shutter time lag that is at least like
the E-10 (100ms).
C.H.Ling
David Irisarri Vila wrote:
>
>
> > My impression with companies going digital is, they tend to apply an
> > "bait and switch" policy. No interest in after sale product support,
> > good example are scanner driver. There is not much enthusiasm with
> > Nikon, Canon, Minolta to write new or improved driver for out of
> > production models.
> >
> > Hmm, after writing that do I realy want to spend money for an slide
> > scanner?
>
> I think it愀 useless spending money into one slide scanner when
> you can work with pure RGB images comming from your CAMEDIA.
> The next generation software it would be colour management
> programs like Binuscan, that will read raw-36bit image data
> from your digital camedia and will convert it to T-MAX,
> Ektachrome E100 S,SW,VS, Velvia, colour gamut!!! Think about
> the future.
>
> Dave
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|