Richard Schaetzl <Richard.Schaetzl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(Quoting Dave): "and you can see this chromatic aberration even into
photographic paper at 10x15cm!!!"
10x15! No way! At that tiny size nobody would be able to see the flaws of
my 180mm lens.
Richard, I might be mistaken but I don't see any reason why significant
chromatic aberration would not be visible under a loupe on a 4x6inch print,
if the same could be seen on a 24x36mm slide.
Granted, it's possible errors were introduced at various stages in the
process - enlargement, scanning, etc.
But Dave has singled out the 180 lens as the one demonstrating this flaw.
What would be considered an acceptable test to prove or disprove this
assertion?
Lex
===
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|