ML Archive: RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply

Subject:	RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply
From:	Hans van Veluwen <HVeluwen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:46:21 +0200

:Oops.  Bad Lex.  I thought the iS-10/20/30 skipped over ISO 64.

Strangely the iS-1(000) and iS-2(000) are the most limited in their DX
selection:
25,32,50,100,200,400,800,1600,3200 

hnz

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30, (continued) RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30, Hans van Veluwen RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30, Ben Poels Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30, Per Nordenberg Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30, Ray Moth RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Scott Nelson Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Lex Jenkins RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Harridge, Wayne Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Lex Jenkins RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Hans van Veluwen <= RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Lex Jenkins Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Terry and Tracey Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Per Nordenberg Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply -Reply, Scott Nelson Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply -Reply -Reply ;), Hans van Veluwen OM-40 ASA/ISO decoding [was: Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply -Reply -Reply ;)], Per Nordenberg Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply -Reply, Paul Farrar

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] the complete Oly man, Ray Moth
Next by Date:	[OM] Yahoo Auctions - C2000, Reynolds Paul (NAP Cheltenham)
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Lex Jenkins
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Lex Jenkins
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Olympus-OM

RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply