Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply -Reply

Subject: Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply -Reply
From: "Paul Farrar" <farrar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:27:38 -0500 (CDT)
It reads the code; it just may not read all possible values. The ISO code is

    |   SQUARE
ISO |  2 3 4 5 6
----------------
  25         *  
  32           *
  40         * *
  50   *     *  
  64   *       *
  80   *     * *
 100     *   *  
 125     *     *
 160     *   * *
 200   * *   *
 250   * *     *
 320   * *   * *
 400       * *
 500       *   *
 640       * * *
 800   *   * *
1000   *   *   *     
1280   *   * * *
1600     * * *
2000     * *   *
2500     * * * *
3200   * * * *
4000   * * *   *
5000   * * * * *

If you hold the cartridge with the long spool end to the left, 
the squares 1-6 are L to R on the top row.

Manufacturers can save whole pennies in manufacturing cost per 
camera by leaving off sensor pins for "unneeded" ISO speeds. 
A 5c saving means a 25c profit at retail, which for a 4 million
camera run means a million dollars in profit. 5 pins will sense 
all possible ISO values. But only 2 and 4 are needed to sense 
the difference between 100, 200, 400, and 800, which will do for 
most P&Ses, 2,3&4 will get all the ISO=25*2**n, n=0,7 values. 
Adding pin 5 or 6 will catch the occasional roll of ISO 64, but 
not the ISO 160 & 320 pro films. (With 5, 160 will round to 
100; with 6, 160 will round to 125 - apparently the IS-30 does 
this.) Look in the film compartment of your cameras. Some sense 
squares with pairs of pins. Others have a ground pin in square 
1 (which is always present for that purpose) and single pins 
for the ISO squares. Some really cheap cameras will have only 
pin 4 or 5 to sense 100 vs. 400.

> 
> Well, this just shows how little I know about DX. I had no idea the camera 
> would
> read anything other than the code on the film canister. It's a good thing I've
> never used DX on my OM-PC. I have no choice with the Stylus Epic, however. I
> find this rounding down a bit thick. Of course, even cameras where you set the
> ISO number manually don't provide every possible value, but at least they 
> don't
> just swag it. I don't think I'd buy a computer that could only resolve numbers
> to within ten digits of the entered value. Well, that would be a Wintel with 
> the
> early Pentium chip, wouldn't it?
> 
> >>> "Hans van Veluwen" <hcvanveluwen@xxxxxxxxx> 08/24/00 04:11pm >>>
> 
> : I have no idea how this is possible. Please splain.
> :
> : <<OTOH the iS-3000 gives ...a more
> : accurate DX decoding,>>
> 
> 
> The iS-3(000) can decode:
> 
> 25,32,40,50,64,80,100,125,160,200,250,320,400,500,640,800,1000,1250,1600,200
> 0,2500,3200,4000,5000
> 
> 
> The iS-30(0) can decode:
> 
> 25,32,50,64,100,125,200,250,400,500,800,1000,1600,2000,3200
> 
> 
> Intermediate values will be rounded downwards; so 160 ASA film will be rated
> 125, 320 ASA film will be rated 250. Bad news for users of Ektachrome 160T,
> users of films like Portra 160 or Tri-X Pan 320 probably won't mind the 1/3
> stop off-DX decoding?
> 
> Btw, pushing a film with the iS-3000 can also be a nightmare; one hit on the
> reset button also cancels exposure compensation, which is the only way to
> overrule this DX decoding :((
> 
> 
> hnz
> 
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz