Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply

from Terry and Tracey

Subject:	Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply
From:	"Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 25 Aug 2000 21:01:20 +1000

I do a big second on that Lex. I've found Han's page much better than the
manual. I use it all the time.

Foxy

----- Original Message -----
BTW, I really appreciate the exhaustive work you did in compiling the
iS-series page.  I practically memorized that page while shopping around for
mom's camera.

Lex
===




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30, (continued) Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30, Per Nordenberg Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30, Ray Moth RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Scott Nelson Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Lex Jenkins RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Harridge, Wayne Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Lex Jenkins RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Hans van Veluwen RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Lex Jenkins Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Terry and Tracey <= Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Per Nordenberg Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply -Reply, Scott Nelson Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply -Reply -Reply ;), Hans van Veluwen OM-40 ASA/ISO decoding [was: Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply -Reply -Reply ;)], Per Nordenberg Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply -Reply, Paul Farrar

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Kentucky For Lex, Terry and Tracey
Next by Date:	[OM] FAO Texans on the list - a suitable subject?, Ian A. Nichols
Previous by Thread:	RE: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Lex Jenkins
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] IS-3 versus IS-30 -Reply, Per Nordenberg
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]