What? Olympus getting heavy? I notice you have two 50's listed. Since
speed isn't often a factor for me (sharpness and contrast are), is there
any advantage in having the 1.4? I already have the 1.8. For
landscape/nature photography, wouldn't an f3/5 macro make more sense if I
were to have two 50's?
John
Gettis John wrote:
> 24 2.8 Zuiko
> 28 2.8 vivitar
> 35 2.8 Zuiko
> 50 1.8 Zuiko
> 50 1.4 Zuiko
> 75-205 3.8 Vivitar
> 100 2.8 Zuiko
> 300 4.5 Zuiko
> 2x teleconverter Zuiko
> Set of olympus extension tubes
> I would have more but the wife draws the line at selling the children.
> Besides she won't carry the bag any more and its getting heavy.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|