Gary;
Yeah, come to think of it, that was my justification when I got mine. :>)
George
>No one here has to explain why one NEEDS a 350/2.8. You just do. :-)
>
>Gary
>
>
>>From: "George M. Anderson" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: [OM] And the Winner is...
>>Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 08:56:52 -0700
>>
>>Ken;
>>
>>Hallelujah, brother!
>>
>>A good decision and a great testimonial to the camera.
>>
>>Get a new one so you'll have no worries about condition. After all, a
>>used one could be up to 14 or 15 years old.
>>
>>george
>>
>>PS: You still haven't explained what you need a 350/2.8 for?
>>
>>
>>Ken Norton wrote:
>> >
>> > And the winner is....
>> >
>>SNIP
>> >
>> > Yup, folks, it's an Olympus OM-4Ti.
>> >
>> > Ken Norton
>> > Image66
>> >
>>
>>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|