Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] LONG - Film Scanners

Subject: Re: [OM] LONG - Film Scanners
From: Gregg Iverson <giverson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 18:28:36 -0400
When they first came out there was a sampling rate referred to.  I
believe you were right as to 2x, 4x, 8x etc.

This was way before the CDs in computers.

Gregg

george wrote:
> 
> Zuiks;
> 
> Based on new information, let me be the first to say my description of what
> 2X, 4X etc means below for audio CDs may actually be a load of ....
> 

> 
> -
> 
> >Tim;
> >
> >Fantastic. Best explanation of the process I've seen.
> >
> >Analogy of course is audio CD players. When they first arrived if I
> >recall they were '2X' which meant either they sampled at the Nyquist
> >limit or double it, not positive which. They didn't sound all that good.
> >Within a year or 2, they were 8X or 16X, ie 4 and 8 times more sampling.
> >They sound good.
> >
> >George
> >>
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz