Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 200/f4 vs. 180/f2.8

Subject: Re: [OM] 200/f4 vs. 180/f2.8
From: "Paul Van Gossum" <paul.vangossum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 15:56:33 +0200
I will scan in some pictures and post a link when done. (please do not expect 
this to be done tomorrow).
BTW, I do like the fact that it is possible to tell negative things on this 
list and not being spammed by 'die-hard' fans. Great list!

| Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:28:31 -0500 (CDT)
| From: "Barry B. Bean" <bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| Subject: Re: [OM] 200/f4 vs. 180/f2.8
|
| It's worth noting that I have seen this complaint enough times not to
| dismiss it, but I have never seen this in my own shots.
|
|On Thu, 14 Oct 1999 09:57:41 +0200, Paul Van Gossum wrote:
| the 180 is great to work with, but the results are poor: when there
| is a high contrast on a photo (eg | a bright background) you will
| see a blue coma around the edges of the bright part of the picture
| (eg the mountaintop).



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz