| Subject: | Re: [OM] 200/f4 vs. 180/f2.8 |
|---|---|
| From: | ClassicVW@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Oct 1999 16:40:08 EDT |
In a message dated 10/15/1999 9:39:38 AM EST, paul.vangossum@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > BTW, I do like the fact that it is possible to tell negative things on this > list and not being spammed by 'die-hard' fans. Great list! Oh boy.... stick around......<g> George S. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Millenium Flying Fantasy, Ingemar Uvhagen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM2 w T-32 was (Fwd) OM-2 Meter, Jan Steinman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200/f4 vs. 180/f2.8, Craig H |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200/f4 vs. 180/f2.8, Gregg Iverson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |