Re: [OM] Age data was Non-OM, Non-NG

[c.e. packard]

Quite correct my astute friend. 
Isn't weird that no matter how carefully an email is proof-read, the
obvious error isn't discovered until after the 'SEND' button has been clicked.

C. Packard Birmingham AL USA

Giles wrote:
> 
> You got the story right up until you said AGFA - that should be Fuji ;-)
> 
> Giles
> 
> c.e. packard wrote:
> 
> > 4 rolls of AGFA Reala 100. My friends were VERY impressed with the results.
> 
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >