Again I agree with Bob.
I believe that any decision made by a computer which is being allowed to
exercise “artificial intelligence” would be questioned by spectators of the
process. I’ve watched experts extolling their progress in the field of AI, but
it has always looked limited. The step beyond mere automation is probably a
step too far to achieve, anyway.
Chris
> On 17 Jun 16, at 01:28, Bob Whitmire <fujixbob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> While absolutes ought to be avoided, I think AI remains impossible. I refuse
> to think of human beings as organic computers. I also refuse to believe we
> who do not know who or what we are or where we fit can design a device to
> connect to something we can't prove the existence of. Nothing I have seen or
> read suggests to me there is proof that the subconscious exists. I believe it
> does, but the evidence is circumstantial. <g>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|