It's nice that you were able to sharpen the image some more and improve
it. I never even thought of that or of checking a histogram for blowh
highlights. But I stand by my statement. The blades of grass are well
resolved.. by lens and sensor. The detail is more visible after
sharpening but there is nothing visible that wasn't before. There is
nothing wrong with his E3 or E-M5 despite what FastStone says.
Chuck Norcutt
On 5/18/2016 4:42 PM, Moose wrote:
========================
On 5/18/2016 6:49 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
What I think it that you worry too much. Your images look just fine
to me. Take the image with the sheep, for example (an E-M5 image).
There are thousands and thousands of blades of grass in the
foreground. Even though they can only be a pixel or two wide they're
well resolved at 100%.
I disagree, strongly.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/BSwale/Sheep_Grass.htm>
========================
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
.
|