Moose wrote:
> Only because of situations like Chuck's rating and sorting. He has perfectly
> good apps for what he wants to do. But people here keep praising LR to the
> skies, so he feels he must be missing something. I believe the truth is that
> your method is a great one for large numbers of images, and you should
> suggest it to others. But, as it happens, you initially mixed up the method
> with LR, whereas it can, in fact, be easily used with other programs.
>
> If you hadn't conflated the two, Chuck wouldn't have been concerned, and
> this whole thread would not have happened. ;-)
Ah, Now I understand. I think. Let's go back to what I had written:
"But I learned a nifty editing trick a couple of years ago which
totally revolutionized it for me. I happen to be using Lightroom, but
this works for most systems:"
MISS UNDERSTOOD SCHNOZZ
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|