Re: [OM] I got tired of waiting...

[Chuck Norcutt]

It's the "can actually be carried" part that's different.  For FF film 
or the 5D I had 18-2000 available.  But available and used are 2 
different things... expecially when the 2000mm lens tube alone weighs 25 
lbs.
Chuck Norcutt


On 11/28/2014 5:00 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 11/27/2014 7:53 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> > This should satisfy my lens gear urge for quite a while.  Going from
> > 9-300mm or 18-600mm 35mm equivalent gives me the longest focal length
> > range I've ever owned (that can actually be carried).
> It's that last part that really makes a huge difference. I had 18-1000
> for FF, and 18-600 eq. actually in the field on occasion for APS-C, but
> it sure isn't the same. :-)
>
> Having F.L. Fun Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/