[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] In case you hadn't heard....

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] In case you hadn't heard....
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:27:01 +0000
And you should remember, Chuck, that I’m not arguing on the basis of climate 
change, man-made or not.  I am saying that we need to reduce our dependence on 
a dwindling supply of fuel, fossil fuel.  I don’t want the countryside in the 
UK wrecked by frac(k)ing , nor the ice caps desecrated by an increasingly 
desperate search for oil or gas.

There must be a better way, and we have to start by using less energy; oh, OK, 
not quite as much tomorrow and the next day :-)


On 24 Mar 2014, at 16:08, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> But you know I don't agree with that and here's the reason why.  Despite 
> the claims that "the science is settled" and that "97% of climate 
> scientists agree" neither the "science" nor the computer models based on 
> the "science" have been able to make an accurate climate projection that 
> covers the warming hiatus evident in the temperature observations since 
> about 1998.

Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz