Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Does software choice matter in producing image "quality" ?

Subject: Re: [OM] Does software choice matter in producing image "quality" ?
From: Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:37:19 -0500
I believe one of those old coots may be related to me. <g>

Of course if you're from them parts, you know them boys knowed each other well 
enough to know better to bet a jug of corn likker on that easy a shot. Maybe a 
chaw, or a pull, but never a whole jug.

--Bob Whitmire
Certified Appalachian Neanderthal

On Dec 17, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Jez Cunningham wrote:

> This Brit had to look up "Kentucky windage"...
> Great explanation:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdRLfO9CU2U
> cheers
> jez
> 
> 
> On 17 December 2013 18:19, Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> I'm going out on a limb here, but I think it's more apparent when printing
>> on matte papers, such as Epson's Ultra Smooth Fine Art. With luster or
>> glossy papers, I haven't felt the need to make any adjustments.
>> 
>> One nice thing about LR now is that in the Print module, if you have opted
>> not to soft proof in Develop, there are two sliders, one for brightness,
>> the other for contrast. They make very subtle changes in the print. Problem
>> is, you don't see the adjustment on the screen, so it's strictly Kentucky
>> windage until you get a sense of how the sliders work.
>> 
>> --Bob Whitmire
>> Certified Neanderthal

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz