Thanks for clarifying Bob.
I had always suspected this but felt alone with my thoughts ...
Amities
Philippe
Le 17 déc. 13 à 15:01, Bob Whitmire a écrit :
> Yes and yes. <g> It does make a subtle difference in print sizes,
> especially if you go radically big or small. If you go big, you tend
> to lose a gooch of brightness and a bit more than a gooch of
> contrast. In the old Photoshop-only days, this was corrected using
> curves in soft proofing. Things tend to get a little denser the
> smaller you go, so you might want to ease up a little, especially on
> the contrast. But that's counsel of perfection. Most folks would
> never notice.
>
> --Bob Whitmire
> Certified Neanderthal
>
> On Dec 16, 2013, at 7:16 PM, Moose wrote:
>
>> On 12/14/2013 2:12 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>> Some Neanderthals are pretty smart. I never heard of brightness and
>>> contrast changing according to print size.
>>
>> Sharpening, USM or deconvolution will sometimes have quite an
>> effect along edges. Used at web size, with certain
>> subjects, it can push highlights into clipping.
>>
>> Yes, there are ways to prevent/correct that.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|