| Subject: | Re: [OM] Does software choice matter in producing image "quality" ? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Dec 2013 01:58:01 +1300 |
I notice that Fast Stone informs me that my jpg images are 24 bit ... Brian Swale --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] > Re: Does software choice matter in producing image "quality" ?, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Journalism Today, Ken Norton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sixteen What? [was Does software choice matter in producing image "quality" ?], Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Does software choice matter in producing image "quality" ?, Ralf Loi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |