> "Compared to what?" For me at the moment compared to what I have, a lowly
> 5dii.
> But it matches the zuikos really well, and has more than enough MPixels for
> me.
> I'm really not longing for 34 or more. For my work the combined shift
> results are already
> ca. 36-40 mpixels. Way too big for most clients, and details into the last
> corner.
I'm considering the gobs-o-megapixels only because I'm going into this
with the intent that it's going to be a long-term relationship and I
don't want to find myself longing for more-more-more three years from
now. My big-honkin camera right now has 7.5mp. I'd probably be happy
as a clam with 16-18, but if 30+ is available, why not? Might as well
future-resist myself for a while.
The reality is that 1/4 of the megapixels is still more than adequate
for nearly all practical purposes.
I cast a long uncomfortable glance at an M Monochrome sitting in the
case. If it was a lady, I'd have been slapped and called a creep,
stalker or something.
I went back to the m4/3 case and stared at everything there. It's very
weird, but I feel nothing. Absolutely nothing. I feel like Jacob
getting Leah instead of Rachel. Leah (4/3 sensor) is ok, but I really
prefer Rachel (35mm sensor). I've already put my 7 years in on Leah,
it's time for 7 years on Rachel.
AG (a Biblical reference for you heathens) Schnozz
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|