| Subject: | Re: [OM] Sonie A7r, was OM-D |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:34:18 -0700 |
> You are correct, and I suspect the jpeg engine as well, must be churning > along at some speed to handle these files! But why not use the E-M1 then? > Very good glass, enough resolution. Sensor size. I'm only interested in full-frame at this point, unless some reduction optic happens along that I like. -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-D E-M1, Ken Norton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - new stuff!, Paul Braun |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sonie A7r, was OM-D, Iwert Bernakiewicz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sonie A7r, was OM-D, Iwert Bernakiewicz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |