That brings up a question for your engineer, pixel-peeper types: Is there a set
of best sizes for monitor display. Epson printers, for example, prefer 360 dots
per inch. You don't have to abide by their preferences, but print quality
sometimes suffers at the odder dpi. Is 1024 pixies a better display than, say,
1750? Or, if the original is 800, should the larger be at 1600?
Just curious.
--Bob
On Jan 9, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I hadn't tried full size the first time I looked at it but it does open
> into a larger window now. The problem with 2064 pixels is that it's
> larger than the 1980 pixels of an HD screen and that's before the frame
> and scroll bars get appended. But they probably wouldn't be there if
> the iamge didn't need to be scrolled... hint, hint. :-)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|