Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Getting closer (Digital -> Adox CHS mapping)

Subject: Re: [OM] Getting closer (Digital -> Adox CHS mapping)
From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:21:46 -0500
Dawid,

I am impressed. I agree that you are getting closer. I've tried one
roll of Efke, but royally screwed up the processing. Hey, it was a
personal experiment, OK?


> OMG, the E-system cameras and lenses are ugly and bulky compared to the
> OMs. But the results from those lenses are worth it - they really are
> the best I've ever used save for one aspect: Light Transmission / Flare
> resistance (and how could they be, with like 23 glass elements inside).

That surprised me, Dawid. I've been very impressed with the flare
resistance of these lense. Probably the best I've seen, though, is the
Panny/Leica 14-54. That lens is really incredible in this regard. The
Digital Zuikos do tend to mute the contrasts just a smidge. If I were
to render a guess, it's because one of the primary targets for the
E-system was portraiture and event photography. For that application,
toning down the contrast is a good thing. The lower constrast of the
lenses also helps get more effective dynamic range stuffed into what
the sensor can capture.

AG

-- 
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz