I guess what I'm saying is that I love the ease of digital but prefer the
look of film. I'm an old fogie and, while I would never go back to the
darkroom, I'm still scanning every day.
Tina
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Chuck Norcutt <
chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If it looks like plastic there's something else wrong. But adding
> grain? Ugh!
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 6/12/2012 9:30 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
> > Hi, Moose -
> >
> > I'll have to admit that I like grain unless it is so coarse as to
> interfere
> > with or dominate the photo. I like what you did with Alejandrina,
> though.
> > Noise remover program?
> > My main objection to most digital is that it is too plastic looking so I
> > usually even add grain to digital - just a tiny bit!
> >
> > Tina
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Chuck Norcutt<
> > chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> And I need to admit as well that I'm one of that small minority with
> >> Moose who has a dislike for the vast majority of pictures showing
> >> grain... whether film grain or digital noise. It's not at all part of
> >> the real world. I've been used to low noise digital for too long
> already.
> >>
> >> Chuck Norcutt
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/12/2012 6:55 AM, philippe.amard wrote:
> >>> The Wizzard strikes once more - Excellent job on both Sir.
> >>>
> >>> Amitiés
> >>> Philippe
> >>>
> >>> Le 12 juin 12 à 12:11, Moose a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>> Oops, bad link.<
> >>
> http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Manley/Alejandrina_Gomez_Dominguez_age_2.htm
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 6/11/2012 10:38 PM, Moose wrote:
> >>>>> On 6/8/2012 8:25 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> >>>>>> Yes, you are THE Tina Manley. Somebody get Moose a comb before he
> >>>>>> comes online. I don't think I can handle the thought
> >>>>>> of him doing Moosifications to Tina's photos.
> >>>>> Too late!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi THE Tina. AG is one of the majority contingent that thinks grain
> >>>>> (or noise, in a pinch) makes most images better. I'm
> >>>>> part of a small minority (one? two?) who believe grain is just an
> >>>>> unfortunate byproduct of imaging chemistry.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think that if early photographic processes were grainless, nobody
> >>>>> today would put up with it, seeing it as an effect
> >>>>> to be used very seldom. That's not to say I dislike all grainy/
> >>>>> noisy images, just most of them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> All prelude to saying how much I like the image "Alejandrina Gomez
> >>>>> Dominguez age 2" on the first page you pointed us to.
> >>>>> Shot on film in 2001, in the dark, grain was a given. Still, I
> >>>>> think it's even nicer without so much grain.
> >>>>> <cid:part1.00090803.02010400@gmail.com>
> >>>>> A much better job could be done with the original size, but I hope
> >>>>> the idea is clear.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Noiseless Moose
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> >>>> --
> >>>> _________________________________________________________________
> >>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> >>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> >>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> >> --
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> >> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> >> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|