Hi, Moose -
I'll have to admit that I like grain unless it is so coarse as to interfere
with or dominate the photo. I like what you did with Alejandrina, though.
Noise remover program?
My main objection to most digital is that it is too plastic looking so I
usually even add grain to digital - just a tiny bit!
Tina
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Chuck Norcutt <
chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And I need to admit as well that I'm one of that small minority with
> Moose who has a dislike for the vast majority of pictures showing
> grain... whether film grain or digital noise. It's not at all part of
> the real world. I've been used to low noise digital for too long already.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 6/12/2012 6:55 AM, philippe.amard wrote:
> > The Wizzard strikes once more - Excellent job on both Sir.
> >
> > Amitiés
> > Philippe
> >
> > Le 12 juin 12 à 12:11, Moose a écrit :
> >
> >> Oops, bad link.<
> http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Manley/Alejandrina_Gomez_Dominguez_age_2.htm
> >>>
> >>
> >> On 6/11/2012 10:38 PM, Moose wrote:
> >>> On 6/8/2012 8:25 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> >>>> Yes, you are THE Tina Manley. Somebody get Moose a comb before he
> >>>> comes online. I don't think I can handle the thought
> >>>> of him doing Moosifications to Tina's photos.
> >>> Too late!
> >>>
> >>> Hi THE Tina. AG is one of the majority contingent that thinks grain
> >>> (or noise, in a pinch) makes most images better. I'm
> >>> part of a small minority (one? two?) who believe grain is just an
> >>> unfortunate byproduct of imaging chemistry.
> >>>
> >>> I think that if early photographic processes were grainless, nobody
> >>> today would put up with it, seeing it as an effect
> >>> to be used very seldom. That's not to say I dislike all grainy/
> >>> noisy images, just most of them.
> >>>
> >>> All prelude to saying how much I like the image "Alejandrina Gomez
> >>> Dominguez age 2" on the first page you pointed us to.
> >>> Shot on film in 2001, in the dark, grain was a given. Still, I
> >>> think it's even nicer without so much grain.
> >>> <cid:part1.00090803.02010400@gmail.com>
> >>> A much better job could be done with the original size, but I hope
> >>> the idea is clear.
> >>>
> >>> Noiseless Moose
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> >> --
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> >> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> >> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
>
--
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|