Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] An actual jpeg

Subject: Re: [OM] An actual jpeg
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 03:11:15 -0700
Oops, bad link. 
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Manley/Alejandrina_Gomez_Dominguez_age_2.htm>

On 6/11/2012 10:38 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 6/8/2012 8:25 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Yes, you are THE Tina Manley. Somebody get Moose a comb before he comes 
>> online. I don't think I can handle the thought
>> of him doing Moosifications to Tina's photos.
> Too late!
>
> Hi THE Tina. AG is one of the majority contingent that thinks grain (or 
> noise, in a pinch) makes most images better. I'm
> part of a small minority (one? two?) who believe grain is just an unfortunate 
> byproduct of imaging chemistry.
>
> I think that if early photographic processes were grainless, nobody today 
> would put up with it, seeing it as an effect
> to be used very seldom. That's not to say I dislike all grainy/noisy images, 
> just most of them.
>
> All prelude to saying how much I like the image "Alejandrina Gomez Dominguez 
> age 2" on the first page you pointed us to.
> Shot on film in 2001, in the dark, grain was a given. Still, I think it's 
> even nicer without so much grain.
> <cid:part1.00090803.02010400@gmail.com>
> A much better job could be done with the original size, but I hope the idea 
> is clear.
>
> Noiseless Moose
>

-- 
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz