In which case, Chuck, it's possible that the 2 birds are the same one, and that
the 3rd instance was eliminated by chance; if one of the overlaps had been in a
certain place and that part of the image was eliminated to make the joins.
Which means that you took sufficient images to make a good panorama. I reckon
that distortion is still a threat when you include moving objects in the images.
Chris
On 25 Apr 2012, at 01:36, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I finally thought to go check the individual images and see that only
> three of them contain the birds. Two frames have two birds each and one
> frame has only one. The birds are always generally in the center of the
> overall pano but in different positions of course. It's a mystery to me
> how the software chose what it did. The two birds in the final image
> are from two adjacent frames containing both birds but with the final
> image having only one of each bird from each frame.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|