That's a lovely picture, Chuck.
I am surprised about the application being able to eliminate parts of the
image; it's a very impressive capability, but perhaps one that you might not
want if it made the wrong choice.
Chris
On 24 Apr 2012, at 23:21, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I understand what you mean now that you've used distortion rather than
> compression. However, I don't think the software operates as you
> surmise. I probably took at least a minute and maybe even two minutes
> making the images that comprise the pano. During that time the bird was
> all over the place but always somewhere within the view that I was
> making. It's clear to me that the software recognized that this was a
> single moving object, chose one and deleted the others. Had it tried to
> make all the bird's positions fit one the final image would have been a
> distorted mess. It's not. It may be the best pano I took in Scotland.
> Now that I look at it again I see there are two birds. Could be the
> same one but I don't think so. In any case he was flying around over
> enough area that he could have appeared in most of the 9 images that
> make up this pano. You can see it here... it's Loch Fyne:
> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/Loch%20Fyne/>
>
> Clicking on the one image gets you a really big one.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|