Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Seriously, who needs a Noctilux?

Subject: Re: [OM] Seriously, who needs a Noctilux?
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:35:14 -0700
On 4/10/2012 1:34 PM, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> In my experience, if there is one thing the Olympus lenses aren't, it's 
> really tough. Compared to cheap plastic lenses 
> maybe, but I have *lightly* bumped both my 50/1.4 and 24/2, causing massive 
> front filter ring damage (more than just 
> slight bending, I am talking about spectacular bending). Was quite difficult 
> to fix so that I could attach filters again. 

Yeah, my 28/2 has a bent filter ring. The part has been NLA for many years. I 
could bash it out, but the lens is so 
beautiful otherwise ... I've been on the lookout for one cheap with some other 
serious problem, but a clean ring. No 
luck so far, but a surprising number of them pass by on the 'Bay.

Bent Moose

-- 
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz