Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Seriously, who needs a Noctilux?

Subject: Re: [OM] Seriously, who needs a Noctilux?
From: Dawid Loubser <dawid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:36:26 +0200
I did, yes. Very interesting. The only ironic thing is that this will  
produce images
"equivalent" to a humdrum 35mm f/2.0 on, say, an OM camera. And the  
17.5mm Nokton would
have to resolve twice as well as the equivalent 35mm f/2.0 to produce  
the same
image quality, which is quite difficult to do.

Still, I have great admiration for the genuinely interesting lenses  
Cosina Voigtländer
has produced for 35mm, and for Micro4/3.

Dawid


On 11 Apr 2012, at 5:32 PM, <classicvw@xxxxxxx> <classicvw@xxxxxxx>  
wrote:

>
> Speaking of a Noctilux, did anyone else notice that Voightlander  
> announced a 17.5mm Nocti (0.95) in micro 4/3 mount?
> That'll give a nice 35mm equivalent.  $1249 I believe, price tag.
>
> -George
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz