I've just done a quick comparison of Olympus Master, Viewer and
AfterShotPro. The converted JPGs from Master & Viewer look identical, but
those from ASP look different. I shot a grey card in a typical area at home
I'd normally shoot in and while the grey card colour for ASP looked the same
as Master/Viewer the shadow areas of the image were a subtly different
colour (slightly green) and the brightness was marginally higher. No issues
with any of them that couldn't be handled by a minor tweak of the processing
parameters.
I probably prefer the UI for Olympus Viewer over Master or ASP.
...Wayne
>
> Seems like Olympus Viewer 2 is the replacement for both Master and
> Studio:
>
> http://www.olympus-europa.com/consumer/205_olympus_viewer_2.htm
>
>
> ...Wayne
>
>
> > >
> > > So I'm P***ED off with Raw Therapee and will probably choose
> between
> > > AfterShotPro, Master or Studio for processing ORFs in the future.
> > >
>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|