On 1/18/2012 7:43 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> It was my understanding (from where I don't know) that ACR and some
> other converters try to go the manufacturer's converters one better by
> extrapolating beyond the clipped channel. How they do that and how
> successful they are I don't know.
They do it by guessing based on near pixels.
This is the only clear example I know of. The software has all been updated
since and it's not generalizable to other
camera, especially non Canon. However, it does present a good example of how
different approaches may give quite
different results. <http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos5d/page23.asp>
Recovering Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|