Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Any scanning suggestions?

Subject: [OM] Any scanning suggestions?
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:15:03 -0400
I'm now going over some of the photos that I rescued from the flood 
waters recently.  Some have sustained some minor damage.  Most probably 
won't get fixed but I decided to try fixing any problems on the six 
8x10s from my friends' wedding album.  Since these were heavy weight B&W 
matte prints they fared very well.  The dreaded waxed paper simply fell 
off the surface without leaving any residue.  However, the plastic 
sleeves they were in (which had to be cut open) did pull some speckles 
of emulsion off here and there but it's all easily repairable with the 
clone tool

But one print in particular is causing me some frustration.  There's 
actually very little damage (just some white speckling near the top of 
the image which is nothing but the back wall of the church... easy fix). 
  However, scanning the image in order to effect the repair, causes more 
trouble than the original speckling.  On the groom's very black tuxedo 
the scan shows wispy, wavy light gray bands crossing most of his jacket. 
  If I examine the original print very closely and hold it at just the 
right angle I can see the same phenomenon visually and it's due to the 
print not being perfectly flat.  But the scan itself makes it 10 times 
more visible than it actually is and, of course, you don't have to hold 
it "just so" in order to see it.

I've tried re-dampening and pressing the print again to get it flatter. 
  I've tried adding weight (lots of books) to press it flat.  Nothing 
seems to help.  No matter what I do, what I can just barely see with my 
eye stands out like a sore thumb in the scan.

I know how to fix it.  I discovered that I can make another layer, 
increase the contrast until the gray disappears, add a mask to reveal 
the original and then paint with white to reveal the darkened area 
above.  Works OK but is very tedious to blend in properly with the brush.

I've never seen scan behavior like this before.  Anyone have an idea 
about how to avoid the problem during the scan?

Chuck Norcutt
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz