Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Royal Wedding in London

Subject: Re: [OM] Royal Wedding in London
From: John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 20:57:30 -0300
Be grateful that you don't have a twice or thrice times bankrupt carnival 
barker looking to occupy your oval office !  Don't fret about the Union Jack 
.... Obama's home turf still fly it with pride as part of their state flag !

jh



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Fildes" <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Royal Wedding in London


> Our flag is a British ensign (indicating ownership) and our head of state 
> a British representative. I would have thought that the reasons were 
> self-evident - mainly symbolic of course but symbols are very important.
> The selection and confirmation of the Governor General is a matter of 
> supreme indifference to most so it is carried out in a fairly ad hoc 
> manner.
> At the time of the debate a number of suggestions were made. An election 
> for a powerless figurehead is clearly a ridiculous expense although it 
> might give the position some stature. Unfortunately it would guarantee 
> that a 'politician' would be appointed as it would be contested.
> There was a much more sensible suggestion that the head of state be 
> selected by a 2/3rds majority of the parliament. This was decried at the 
> time by some loud idiots who described it as a 'politician's president' 
> and they demanded an electoral process. However, the 2/3rds rule would 
> ensure that only a worthy candidate, acceptable to both sides, would 
> succeed. A government could not put up a superannuated politician and get 
> him/her elected.
> The reason it failed was because it was John Howard who got to write the 
> referendum questions - and he was a keen monarchist. Consequently he 
> muddied the waters with convoluted questions (remember the 'Preamble') and 
> divided the republican movement. It's a nightmare getting a constitutional 
> referendum up at the best of - it'll fail unless both sides in parliament 
> are in general agreement.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 01/05/2011, at 10:25 PM, David Thatcher wrote:
>
>> I was a staunch republican when I was a vexatious youth, but now I
>> wonder what the point of the change would be - it would be a colossal
>> waste of money if the model used to appoint the GG is used to appoint a
>> President. This is was what was offered at our referendum - and, in my
>> opinion, one of the main reasons that it failed.
>
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz