Le mardi 29 mars 2011 00:31:20, Ken Norton a écrit :
> > E-p2 has only metal shell and 2nd dial going for it. Not much, really,
> > it's reeking of soon to come EOL. In any cas, E-pl2 will retain longer a
> > better resale value should you decide on an hypothetical e-p3 soon.
>
> OK, let me put it this way: I'd buy a used E-P2 kit over a used E-PL2
> kit, but I'd buy a new E-PL2 kit over a new E-P2 kit. Three years from
> now, the E-P2 will be a more desirable camera because of the
> intangibles.
I understand perfectly. I am myself very happy of the controls of my e-p1 and
like the way it handles.
Nonetheless, from a purely economical POV, e-pl2 + 17mm (even if it's a
disappointing prime optically, it's a more than apt see-through body cap when
it comes "free") + 14~42 Mk2 + evf makes much more sense than e-p2 + 14~42 mk1
+ evf alone, considering you'd need to add quite a bit of money to just get
the 17 and an FL-14 to barely match functions between both (circa 400 € where
I live, a bit less in the US I believe).
Cheers,
--
Manuel Viet
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|