ML Archive: Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7

Subject:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:24:43 -0600

Moose wrote:
> Oh man, that's a little creepy. :-)
> All my life, people have asked me how I knew  . . .


Further proof that we were separated at birth. Obviously, I'm from the
right side, though. :)

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, (continued) Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, George Themelis Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, manuel viet Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Marc Lawrence Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, bill pearce Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Brian Swale Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Moose Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Moose Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Carlos J. Santisteban Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Hyper/Hypo Stereo (Re: Panny 20/1.7), George Themelis

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] OT; looking elsewhere, Ken Norton
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 17/2/2011: interesting weather, Bob Whitmire
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Moose
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Moose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7