ML Archive: Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7

Subject:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7
From:	Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:26:28 -0500

On Feb 2, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Dawid Loubser wrote:

> The question is, what *couldn't* you use as subjects, with this lens?

Birds? <g>

--Bob


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Sandy Harris Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Carlos J. Santisteban [OM] PanaLeica 25/1.4, Was: Panny 20/1.7, Dawid Loubser Re: [OM] PanaLeica 25/1.4, Was: Panny 20/1.7, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Brian Swale Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Dawid Loubser Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, George Themelis Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Bob Whitmire <= Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, George Themelis Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, manuel viet Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Marc Lawrence Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, bill pearce Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Brian Swale Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Ken Norton

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] (OT) (OM) Use of verbs etc, Bob Whitmire
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Circ Pols, Ken Norton
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, George Themelis
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Ken Norton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7