| Subject: | [OM] E-5 vs GH2 sensor |
|---|---|
| From: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:34:10 -0400 |
The actual statement was ambiguous on the rumor site: "managed to
improve the High-ISO performance by 1 stop"
which I read as same noise at one higher stop higher ISO. " We
shouldn't have to wait too long to find out. I really like the
over-sized multi-aspect ratio sensor. There was a rumor before that it
would have a global shutter--perhaps there is too much noise as the
sensor would run a bit hot as I understand it.
I wish they had a very nice performing folded optics zoom and a few
more nice fast primes--could be a very nice compact solution. Not
really pocketable as is so as Moose says "neither fish nor foul", but
still looks appetizing. This should get a long hard look. I had
previously thought AG might jump to a GH2 for some situations until
his more recent purchase.
I wonder if Mr. Fildes has been able to try it? I hope he is back
soon.
Mike
"I won't argue with your definition of dynamic range but will simply
point out once more that your "source" never mentions dynamic range of
the sensor, only that it has a 1 stop higher ISO rating. They are not
the same.
Chuck Norcutt"
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Nathan's PAD 15/9/2010: book signing, usher99 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Nathan's PAD 16/9/2010: ice cream, Nathan Wajsman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-5 vs GH2 sensor, Bill Pearce |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-5 vs GH2 sensor, Ken Norton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |