Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees

Subject: Re: [OM] Re (OM) Foggy trees
From: Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:29:58 -0600
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for the comments and edits. Preferences went both ways I see
> which is pretty much my feeling too. I thought about b&w but went back
> to the color as shot such as it was. I took a few variations on the tree
> which is located along a gravel road. Wasn't too happy with the shots
> with road included which is why the fence is tightly cropped. I may go
> back to those for a second look. The day went from bright sun to fog and
> back at the whim of the wind and tides. Scout on the rock in the sun was
> taken within a few minutes of the fog. I do really like the combo of
> 12~60 with E620.
>
> To share some new to me info about the E620.
> <http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse620/page17.asp> See Shadow
> Adjustment Technology paragraph. I was getting way too much shadow noise
> which is explained in the article.

I was quite taken with SAT (gradation=auto) when I first started using
the E-3.  Sometimes it is really excellent, but it's a pig in a poke.
I find I'm happier just using highlight/shadow tools every once in a
while when I feel the need as the control is so much more powerful and
refined.

Joel W.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz