Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ( OM ) Indecent exposure

Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) Indecent exposure
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:16:20 +0800
I do have lots of shots with sky :-) :

http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/EU/eu04-1.htm

http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/EU/eu04-2.htm

http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/EU/eu04-3.htm

It is not easy to get good sky in Hong Kong but it depends on the time :-)

http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_6029.jpg

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Swale" >

> Take for example, Nathan, CH Ling, Jim Nichols, Marc, and often Wayne
> Harridge; their photos frequently exclude sky. They are of concrete,
> tarseal,
> buildings, people, indoors, closeup flowers.  There is not a wide range of
> illumination where the viewer might expect good detail in all parts - dark
> and
> light.
> And their images have good exposure in part (I suggest) because there is
> no or little sky.
> Ansel Adams managed this with B&W which generally has far greater
> latitude than digital or colour transparency, but even he developed a
> system
> to get the most out of the range..
> And incidentally, the wider range that colour print film copes with is the
> main
> reason I shoot so much print film rather than transparency film.
> ............

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz